Freeze Many Solana Token Accounts at Once

It stops that specific wallet from transferring, selling or swapping your token. They keep the balance and can see it, and they can do nothing with it until you thaw the account. It affects only your token: everything else in that wallet is untouched, because a freeze acts on the token account rather than on the wallet.

No, and this is the part worth sitting with. A freeze acts on the token account, and its owner does not sign. If you hold the freeze authority you can stop any holder from selling at any moment, without warning and without their involvement. That is a real power over other people's assets, and it is precisely why buyers check for it.

No. A mint's freeze authority is set when the token is created and can only ever be given up, never added back. If it was revoked or never set, no account holding that token can be frozen by anyone, including us. That is permanent and, from a holder's point of view, a good thing.

Two reasons, and neither is an error. A wallet that never held your token has no account to freeze. An account already in the state you asked for would make the token program reject the transaction it sits in, taking up to nineteen valid freezes down with it, so it is skipped instead. The summary counts both separately from the ones that will change.

One per twenty accounts. That limit is the size of a Solana transaction rather than a choice of ours, and it was confirmed by running twenty freezes in a single transaction against devnet rather than by estimating. A list of two hundred holders is ten approvals.

No. The fee is charged once per run, on the first transaction, however long the list is. It rides in that same transaction, so if the first one fails you are not charged at all. This is verified on devnet across a run that spans two batches, by watching a real balance rather than by trusting the code.

It tells you exactly where. You get the number of accounts that were frozen, the number that were not, and whether the fee had already been taken. Then run it again over the same list: accounts already frozen are skipped automatically, so a re-run finishes the remainder without double-charging anyone or failing.

Yes, and you should know that before using it. An unrevoked freeze authority is one of the first things a buyer checks, and our own Rug Check reports it as a risk. Using this tool does not make it worse, but holding the authority that makes it possible already counts against you. If you do not need it, revoking it is the stronger signal.

Yes. The tool reads which token program owns the mint and derives each holder's account for that program, so both the original SPL token program and Token-2022 work. Getting this wrong would derive the wrong account addresses entirely, so it is read from the chain rather than assumed.

No. There has to be an account to freeze, and one only exists once the wallet has received the token. There is no way to pre-emptively block an address from ever holding it.